Monthly Archives: October 2018

New friends

I worked sixty hours last week, six days ten hours each. It is a return to the immense hours I have been working for decades. Carefully, I observe myself, checking thoughts and priorities. Exhausted by a lack of sleep, staying awake to attend a Big Book meeting and then Mass at St Paul Shrine, I was surprised by a lunch invitation, extending myself further with an accepting. The lunch proved splendid. The gentleman inviting, Big Myron, has been a presence over the last several weeks. He is a college professor, cultured and world traveled having been to the Lourdes grotto twenty-one times. His devotion to the Eucharist is authentic, practical in approach based upon healing. He explained he was meeting with two other men to discuss codependency. His friend, the man in the photo, took the lead, once assigned by Big Myron. He was told one learned best by teaching. Thoughtfully, he read form the book: ‘Codependent No More’. The fourth man was a retired priest. He presented the question whether one could be codependent upon religion. The discussion moved to the topic of solitude contrasted with loneliness and self-loathing. I am pleased to recognize a new group of male friends. We will meet on Fridays and Saturdays. Fridays discussing Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas, while Saturday is open for a concentration upon codependency. I appreciated Big Myron’s focus upon applying knowledge to daily living. I was astounded he possessed intimate knowledge of the writing and life of J.K. Huysmans. His familiarity with Lourdes, recently reading Huysmans expound upon the naturalist French writer, a contemporary, Emile Zola writing about his experience at Lourdes, made me bring up the movie ‘Lourdes’—a precious movie in my mind. The film is a realistic approach to Lourdes. Within the miracles and wonder, a pragmatism touches. I recommended the movie to Big Myron, stressing an effort going beyond dogma and into transformation. He turned to the other men exclaiming they must watch it. Once again, I watched the movie this morning. I decided to repost a post I did after the initial viewing.

I love the ending of this movie ‘Lourdes’. The underplay of dramatics sweeps my heart subtly into profoundness. Obedience witnessed. The entire movie is touching with its minimized need for grand pronouncements, or the vanity of declarative statements. The lack of action and emotion promotes honesty; moving the heart with simplicity, stimulating the mind with wonder. Christine, a charming young woman with multiple sclerosis, experiences a miracle visiting Lourdes. During the middle of the night, unseen, away from the crowds, lacking any form of melodramatics, she rises from her bed and walks into the bathroom to fix her hair. She miraculously gains the use of her legs, able to walk, while seemingly embarrassed for experiencing such a tremendous miracle. Not in the least does she receive the miracle with dramatics, loud proclaiming, nor tears aplenty. Preceding the final scene, she dances with the young man the French nurses all admire. She falls while dancing. The final scene with her mother, after the fall on the dance floor, at first refusing the wheelchair her mother offers, the captivating, beautiful young woman watches and listens to everything before her. The passion within her culminates. It is obvious. She wants to dance. She wants to sing. She wants to love a young man. She wants to be like the nurses, similar young women her age enjoying health and life, able to give to those less fortunate. Within all her heart, within every ounce of her being, within all her understanding, she wants to live life to its fullest as a normal young lady. Her chest heaves, she struggles so deeply with all of her passions, passions that are not evil. In the end, she concedes, acquiescing to the wishes of God. Disarming with her understated eloquence, she accepts. If it is meant for her to be in a wheelchair so be it. She sits in the wheelchair, the scene framed in blackness. Miracles are not necessary for her happiness, her faith. Mysteries are left mysteries. Happy or sad worldly endings are not witnessed as finality. I like the final comment by one of the two older women at the dining table. ‘Do you think there’ll be a dessert’? The movie fades to black as the singing continues with the delightfully catchy French pop song. The will of God is left uninterpreted, darkness regarding ultimate answers remain unanswered. That is a tremendous scene of faith. The faith St John of the Cross writes of in the above quote.

spacer

Email exchange

…appreciate…feelings he has had about his relationships…honesty…disappointment and pain…sharing prompted me to reflect on my own ways of relating to people and…my own experiences…an internal longing for certain types of relationships and contact with people…it makes sense to assume that I may have some unusual patterns of relationships with people in general…my expectations of friendships, I think, are not always healthy…I just wanted to be deep friends long before it was socially normal…

In normal, healthy relationships this is a slow and natural process (it could happen or it might not happen, depending on whether we eventually found us to be mutually compatible–there is no pressure). But for me, it was like I was desperate to be close because I was expecting so much from the relationship. I wanted to force it to happen. The minute I called or sent an email, I would wait all day hoping for a response. If the response took a bit longer, I would be disappointed and read all kinds of things into it…“Maybe I am not liked.” “Maybe I am inferior.” Or if the lack of response happened too many times, I would criticize (attack)…”He is an undependable person.” “He doesn’t know how to have a close friendship.”

When we made arrangements to get together, I would be thinking about it all week. And when we met, I would be listening intently for any sign of affirmation in the conversation to show how he valued our relationship. I wasn’t just enjoying the friendship. I was using it to meet some deep unmet internal need. That is unfair and unhealthy and a lot of pressure to put on a regular friendship.

Fortunately, I was socially mature enough on the outside to know to keep all this to myself…inside, I was full of all this turmoil. If I were honest with myself, I would know that I was clingy and obsessed and desperate for connection…In the end I never became a deep friend…programmed to either seek a deep friend or none at all…I wasn’t satisfied with a normal everyday friendship where we might connect every few weeks or months or at any interval that was mutually good for both of us, even if it were just once a year. It had to fit the ideal in MY mind…I am healthier now and understand some of those dynamics…I have much healthier expectations of my relationships now. But I know that I am always susceptible to such tendencies, so I always try to check myself.

…I have encountered some who also have the clinginess…some who are self-absorbed, unable to take in points of view that differ from their own…some who don’t understand the basics of keeping up a regular periodic dialogue…the relationship dies…some who are overly demanding about relationships…We all have backgrounds with pain and hurts that affects the way we interact with people…need for healing…trying to honestly look in the mirror and face my own unhealthy views and expectations of relationships…trying to have honest, healthy interactions with people…tried to be realistic…Not everyone is skilled at having healthy relationships…that doesn’t mean we dislike them…they are on their journey and they may not have the skills to be a good friend at this time…

………………

Thank you…exactly the kinds of exchanges that give me life…never met in person…connecting…mutually relate…fellow human beings…a tendency to read the other person’s problem as a reflection of me…people often disappoint…

I used to look for that one good friend to satisfy all my friendship needs. I wanted that deep, intimate bosom buddy who took the time to know me well, who knew how to encourage me when I needed, who took the right level of initiative in our friendship, who was interesting, who had similar interests…I could never find the one person to meet this crazy criteria…differently…Instead of finding the one friend…satisfy all my needs…I diversify and accept people for what they are and accept what I can get from each person…No one individual satisfies me…the composite of them together has helped me have a fuller life…not overly desperate with any single one…You said “don’t throw me away.”…I’ve had this exact phrase play in my mind all the time, “throw me away” “toss me aside” “make me feel like I don’t count.”…I have learned that I often overread situations…When someone doesn’t respond to my overtures for friendship in the way I wish, such voices play in my mind…these sorts of thoughts are distortions that come from my childhood hurts…read situations in terms of rejection and non-acceptance….It is not a personal rejection or a criticism of me…don’t “fit” together at this moment in time…areas needing healing, but God did not make a mistake…

………………

Thoughtful and honest, an increasing of self-knowledge leading to surrender–soul expanding reading. I have a friend, an academic, a language specialist and self-acclaimed Christian philosopher/psychologist. He teaches a fundamental and debilitating obstacle for growing in Jesus Christ is self-loathing. The core of our psyche is diabolically attacked by the Father of Lies to form us in a way in which we despise ourselves. As children, within all the love, care, and concern of our parents or maybe in a cruel absence of love (abuse), experience springboards us into disappointment, a movement away from love. Our teen years and young adulthood only hardens and inflates the obstacle—the distance. We cannot accept ourselves—loneliness becomes perpetual. The self-loathing, the lack of trust in ourselves, submerges into our deepest dispositions, emotions, thoughts and thus behavior. We grow foolish, unstable, unable to mature due to unsound psychological needs. The instinctive reaction to turn on one’s self becomes subtler and grows. We become desperate and expect too much, lacking an inability to be honest with ourselves—to truly know ourselves as the Creator knows us. Patterns develop that lead to addiction, codependency, and other forms of frustration. I have decided it would be best to end with words sent to me by an individual here in Courage:

After reading your not-so-hopeful message, I was just prompt to mention to you that no matter how damaged/warped you think you are, nothing is impossible to Jesus since His Grace can, did and will do anything for you as it did for many of us and many throughout the history of Christianity. We cannot change or do anything by ourselves – I agree, but by belief in His Grace, with Him and through Him – all things are possible, remember this. Please pray for His Grace to transform you. ‘For with God nothing will be impossible.” Luke 1:37

spacer

‘Cathedral’

Huysmans continues the conversion of the French writer/aesthete Durtal in the novel ‘Cathedral’. The Cathedral referred to by the title is Chartres. Consecrated in 1260, in the presence of King St Louis, Chartres represents majestically to Durtal all that he pursues in his rejection of decadent modernism and the embracing of a profound Catholic medieval faith. A wearied cultured man, he reverses time in order to move forward spiritually. Appropriate with the anniversary of Fatima, Huysmans opens the second novel of the Durtal Trilogy with an examination of Our Lady’s apparition at the remote Alps town of La Salette, an apparition striking solely based upon foreshadowing similarities with Lourdes and Fatima. Huysmans writes in the most devoted manner of Our Lady. Keep in mind ‘Cathedral’ was written in 1898, before Fatima. Huysmans disturbing and grand descriptions of the geography surrounding La Salette proves spiritually revealing—a cryptic revelation.

He (Durtal) thought of the Virgin, whose watchful care had so often preserved him from unexpected risk, easy slips, or greater falls. Was not She the bottomless Well of goodness, the Bestower of the gifts of good Patience, the Opener of dry and obdurate hearts? Was She not, above all, the living and thrice Blessed Mother?

Bending forever over the squalid bed of the soul, she washes the sores, dresses the wounds, strengthening the fainting weakness of converts. Through all the ages She was the eternal supplicant, eternally entreated; at once merciful and thankful; merciful to the woes She alleviates, and thankful to them too. She was indeed our debtor for our sins, since, but for the wickedness of man, Jesus would never have been born under the corrupt semblance of our image, and She would not have been the immaculate Mother of God. Thus our woe was the first cause of Her joy; and this supremist good resulting from the very excess of Evil, this touching though superfluous bond, linking us to Her, was indeed the most bewildering of mysteries; for Her gratitude would seem unneeded, since Her inexhaustible mercy was enough to attach Her to us forever.

Thenceforth, in Her immense humility, She had at various times condescended to the masses; She had appeared in the most remote spots, sometimes seeming to rise from the earth, sometimes floating over the abyss, descending on solitary mountain peaks, bringing multitudes to Her feet, and working cures…

…On the 19th of September, 1846, the Virgin had appeared to two shepherd children on a hill; it was a Saturday, the day dedicated to Her, which, that year, was a fast day by reason of the Ember week. By another coincidence, this Saturday was the eve of the Festival of Our Lady of Seven Sorrows, and the first vespers were being chanted when Mary appeared as from a shell of glory just above the ground.

And she appeared as Our Lady of Tears in that desert landscape of stubborn rocks and dismal hills. Weeping bitterly, She had uttered reproofs and threats; and a spring, which never in the memory of man had flowed excepting at the melting of the snows, had never since been dried up.

The fame of this event spread far and wide; frantic thousands scrambled up fearful paths to a spot so high that trees could not grow there. Caravans of the sick and dying were conveyed, God knows how, across ravines to drink the water; and maimed limbs recovered, and tumors melted away to the chanting of canticles.

…there are no fir trees, no beeches, no pastures, no torrents; nothing—nothing but total solitude, and silence unbroken even by the cry of a bird, for at that height no bird is to be found.

“What a scene!” thought Durtal, calling up the memories of a journey (to La Salette) he had made with the Abbé Gévresin (spiritual director) and his housekeeper, since leaving La Trappe (‘En Route’ monastery). He remembered the horrors of a spot he had passed between Saint Georges de Commiers and La Mure, and his alarm in the carriage as the train slowly travelled across the abyss. Beneath was darkness increasing in spirals down to the vast deeps; above, as far as the eye could reach, piles of mountains invaded the sky.

The train toiled up, snorting and turning round and round like a top; then, going into a tunnel, was swallowed by the earth; it seemed to be pushing the light of day away in front, till it suddenly came out into a clearing full of sunshine; presently, as if it were retracing its road, it rushed into another burrow, and emerged with the strident yell of a steam whistle and deafening clatter of wheels, to fly up the winding ribbon of road cut in the living rock.

Suddenly the peaks parted, a wide opening brought the train out into broad daylight; the scene lay clear before them, terrible on all sides.

“Le Drac!” (the river) exclaimed the Abbé Gévresin, pointing to a sort of liquid serpent at the bottom of the precipice, writhing and tossing between rocks in the very jaws of the pit.

For now and again the reptile flung itself up on points of stone that rent it as it passed; the waters changed as though poisoned by these fangs; they lost their steely hue, and whitened with foam like a bran bath; then the Drac hurried on faster, faster, flinging itself into the shadowy gorge; lingered again on gravelly reaches, wallowing in the sun; presently it gathered up its scattered rivulets and went on its way…the rippling rings spread and vanished, skinned and leaving behind them on the banks a white granulated cuticle of pebbles, a hide of dry sand.

Durtal, as he leaned out of the carriage window, looked straight down into the gulf; on this narrow way with only one line of rails, the train on one side was close to the towering hewn rock, and on the other was the void. Great God! if it should run off the rails! “What a crash!” thought he.

And what was not less overwhelming than the appalling depth of the abyss was, as he looked up, the sight of the furious, frenzied assault of the peaks. Thus, in that carriage, he was literally between the earth and sky…along interminable balconies without parapets; and below, the cliffs dropped avalanche-like, fell straight, bare, without a patch of vegetation…all round lay a wide amphitheater of endless mountains, hiding the heavens, piled one above another, barring the way to the travelling clouds, stopping the onward march of the sky…

The landscape was ominous; the sight of it was strangely discomfiting; perhaps because it impugned the sense of the infinite that lurks within us. The firmament was no more than a detail, cast aside like needless rubbish on the desert peaks of the hills. The abyss was the all-important fact; it made the sky look small and trivial, substituting the magnificence of its depths for the grandeur of eternal space.

The Abbé had said that the Drac was one of the most formidable torrents in France; at the moment it was dormant, almost dry; but when the season of snows and storms comes it wakes up and flashes like a tide of silver, hisses and tosses, foams and leaps, and can in an instant swallow up villages and dams.

“It is hideous,” thought Durtal. “That bilious flood must carry fevers with it; it is accursed and rotten…Durtal now thought over all these details; as he closed his eyes he could see the Drac and La Salette.

Chartres

La Drac 1900

spacer

Free time

A Saturday reflection, again enjoying three days off from work. The personal time is pleasing, while challenging. I am spending a lot of free time in my new home alone, watching television and reading. My thoughts border always on the extreme, waiting impatiently for something to worry about. I am convinced I can control my thinking, settling myself down, aiming myself toward peace and contentment. Recovery focuses my thoughts upon exercises prescribed by my sponsor. Today, sharing a Big Book meeting, the idea of creating personal space, distance from others, while concentrating upon where I am at and where I am going. I recognize my contentious nature in dealing with the sponsor one-on-one. We speak daily. My obstinate nature seeks self-improvement. The man is sound and structured in his approach, following specific methods based upon experience. Opinions and beliefs are placed aside, at least to the best of our abilities: Part of a prayer he suggests: …Today, God we humbly ask for your direction, care, wisdom guidance, and love as we walk through these steps…and God please set aside everything we think we know about ourselves, the steps, the books, sobriety and you God…and God please help each and every one of us today to have an open mind so that we may have a new experience and discover the truth…. The idea of creating space, separation if necessary from those closest is essential. That void, assisted with impartial guidance, allows the formation of a new truth, a freed discernment struggling with itself rather than others. The detachment is different than the feel-good opposite extreme of self-effacement in which I declare ‘I am the problem’. To fall prostrate, surrendering under the guise, that my being wrong means others are right is set aside. Acceptance without judgement penetrates deeper. I examine myself, scrutinizing myself under the tutelage of another. It is not important to accept absolute culpability, nor to determine, in the slightest degree, the faults of others. It is not easy. Even with the sponsor, I will find myself internally attacking him. It is not difficult to find error. Regarding God, he introduced me to the God of his understanding, showing me a photo on his phone of a mother grizzly bear with three cubs perched upon her back. He explained how he saw the male grizzly bear as his God. I did not confront with the obvious observation that it was a female. Male grizzlies do not care for cubs. If anything, a male will kill the cubs. He went into a serious elaboration on why he saw the adult grizzly as God and himself as one of the cubs. Placing things in order, his perspective on religion does not matter. His role in my life is to assist me with recovery, a life of sobriety. I respect his intelligence, yet overall it is his organized approach to recovery that establishes him as a man I trust in regard to guiding me through the steps. There seems to be a gleam in his eye at times when stressing that it I must realize I will have to establish a whole new understanding of God. It would be easy to become defensive, comprehending there is something within him that would take pleasure in seeing me reject Catholicism. He was raised a Catholic. He is now proud to proclaim he has found a better way to form a personal relationship with God than the religion of his upbringing. I am not threatened, nor feel the need to debate. I explained that my new understanding of God would be centered upon establishing God as a daily means of embracing life. Internally and without being spoken, there is the absolute conviction I would never abandon, nor consider abandoning Catholicism. However, a new understanding and embracing would be welcomed. Religion, for myself, has included a rejection of life. My latest fascination with J.K.Huysmans delves deeply into such a spiritual pursuit. I have no doubt, and signs are apparent, that such a path is a true one for myself. Yet to strengthen that path, I must respond positively and productively to life. God wants progress on the natural level before grace deepens. Detachment is only healthy when one strives to serve God through his brothers, sisters, and the world. When creation is respected, and lived within honestly, humbly, and realistically, only then can grace emerge triumphant. The astute aspect of the sponsor’s charism is his ability to penetrate toward one’s true motivation. I contrast his approach to the originating group welcoming me to Cleveland. I identify the difference between feel-good sentiment, settling for easy group confirmed answers, opposed to a deeper insight determined to reveal enveloping truth—an efficient means of maturing. I can pinpoint matters with a focus upon mothers. With the original group, we discussed relationships with our mothers. They settled upon feel-good sentiment, emotional candy, telling stories how individually they hurt their mothers, accepting all blame, while emotionally proclaiming the immensity of their errant ways. Discussing the matter with my sponsor, I was surprised when he said he did not explain his relationship with his mother amidst recovery crowds. After serious deliberation, including consolation with his sponsor and wife, plus years of sobriety, he discerned he would not allow his mother an intimate role in his life. He approached her thoughtfully and carefully at family gatherings, while holding her constantly in his prayers, yet he would not allow her an active voice in his life. Throughout their relationship she trended toward chaos and drama, involving herself in criminal behavior when he was young. Time after time, she had demonstrated an inability to change; hurting and wounding her son after a lifetime of scaring. The door could be opened; however, he doubted the matter. He would not allow negative relationships to dominate his life. With his mother there was no middle ground, therefore separation was demanded. I make no judgements, nor verdicts. I respect his willingness to go above and beyond in order to establish a deeper embracing of truth. I think of my mother content with the distance we currently suffer. I will be patient, concentrating upon myself. I think of two female relationships important to me; emotional and difficult. Both pull deeply, lovingly, and longingly upon my heartstrings. I accept the distance, pointing no fingers away from myself, grateful for God’s loving whole-hearted attention. The sponsor told me of his thirty-year marriage, the fact his wife is in the program, and that when they both sought relief from alcoholism they separated. He came to understand how codependent they both were. It took the act of letting go of his wife before he could embrace her properly. It took his wife the act of letting go of him before she could accept his embrace with a mature and healthy love. This week they will celebrate their thirtieth anniversary. I am a witness to a new way of doing things, a new relationship with God emerging. I accept people for who they are, expecting nothing from them. All I can do is work upon myself, increasing my capacity for love with a renewed devotion and all-embracing relationship with God. I stop fighting with every and anything. The surrender of my will is in truth a tearful act of purging; a necessary act of healing. How in the world did I sustain fighting so much throughout my life? My sponsor told me about his first year of sobriety, and how he lived in a cloud of haze, sloth, and stupor. Looking back, he learned there was a physical and chemical component to the matter. His thought patterns, his brain patterns, were physically addicted, structured, to adrenalin rushes and an indulgence in the production of pleasure producing neurotransmitters: dopamine, serotonin, endorphins, and oxytocin. After a lifetime of substance abuse, his brain had to find a new way of functioning. His explanation assisted me in coming to terms with my dark and slothful moments when alone. During work, times of prayer: Mass, reading, and times of entertainment, I can function efficiently, able to achieve moments of peak production. However, left alone everything can become a struggle. Socializing is important to my well-being. Hospice work entered my life once again. Several received phone calls brought the matter to light. I went through an orientation process with a Catholic hospice organization, delighted to experience a smile producing relationship with the tutoring gentleman. He is an articulate witty man skilled as a caregiver. During the training, three of us wandered the halls of the hospice, seeking individuals to visit. The gentleman is scrupulous when discerning individuals to approach. He made it clear he only went where he was welcome, always open and attentive for a refusal. I relate it to the ancient Greek axiom: a kindness unwanted is no kindness at all. Consulting with a nurse we learned of two rooms hosting individuals who might be receptive to visitors. The first room provided a woman deeply asleep. We determined it was not wise to wake the woman. The next room I recognized upon approach. The man, seated and eating with a hooded sweatshirt drawn over his head, caught my attention when we walked by as his beaming eyes looked to those passing his room. We quickly established a joyful conversation with the man. The tutor commented the man looked like a monk. He responded he was cold. He continued eating his chicken while informing us of his preferences for movies. He surprised us by sitting up and drawing his hood away from his head, asking for our appraisal of his new haircut. I had to admit his head full of finely washed hair looked well groomed and attractive. He told us how a friend took him to his regular barber in Strongsville. It was obvious the trip away from the hospice did him very well. He said he was pleased with the haircut, yet now understood his beard stubble needed attention. He vowed he would shave that very afternoon. It was not long before I realized how much I missed hospice work, and the fact one received immensely when giving. I received no calls this weekend, while looking forward to filling my weekly three days off with hospice work. Another socializing incident caused reflection. After Mass and a Holy Hour on Friday at St Paul Shrine, I fell into a political discussion with three men in the lobby. The four of us were on the same page, yet overall I felt I could have behaved better. I am convinced in these divisive chaotic times no one is served by seeking like minded individuals and bashing perceived opponents. One of the men was highly intelligent, sickly in appearance, yet obviously a cultured and well-educated man. I thoroughly enjoyed conversation with him. Today during communal prayers, he joined us, while sitting distant. Possibly I am wrong, yet I feel I have piqued his interest. Our leader Shirley informed me of the man’s identity. He has been formerly brought to my attention under the moniker of Big Myron. I am curious now to pursue further conversation. I am confident he will be familiar with J.K. Huysmans. Finally, regarding socializing, St Charles Borromeo charmed today. The call for reconciliation brought me to the church for an early evening visit while a Mass was in the process of dismissing. I seated myself waiting for the attending priest. A young mother stopped close, conducting some type of information gathering effort guided by a child’s Catholic religious publication. The mother and her three children were venturing about the church, seeking out pieces of the church the educational magazine asked them to identify. They stopped at the reconciliation booths and the mother checked off their successful discovery. She asked her children if they knew what the booths were for. A young boy answered it was where you went when you were bad. The mother responded not necessarily bad, rather we sought confession when we acted in ways that were selfish, mean, and against the ways God wanted us to behave. She asked her children to think about times when they behaved in ways that were not recognized as bad, yet still they knew they were not good. She went on to explain the oldest boy would soon be making his first confession. As they moved on to the next item on their search list, heading toward the alter, I noticed a father trailing behind holding a new born, eyes bright and observing. Of course, me being prone to tears, it was not easy hold back an effusion.

spacer

‘En Route’ savoring an ending

“Nothing is left to chance in religion; every exercise which seems at first useless has a reason for its being,” he said to himself, as he went out into the court. “And the fact is, that the rosary, which seems to be only a humming-top of sounds, fulfils an end. It reposes the soul wearied with the supplications which it has recited, applying itself to them, thinking of them; it hinders it from babbling and reciting to God always the same petitions, the same complaints; it allows it to take breath, to take rest, in prayers in which it can dispense with reflection, and, in fact, the rosary occupies in prayer, those hours of fatigue in which one would not pray…. Ah! here is the Father abbot.” –J.K. Huysmans ‘En Route’

St Gertrude’s Golden Salutation of the Blessed Virgin

The Blessed Virgin revealed to St. Gertrude that she rejoiced to show to those who thus saluted her the inestimable treasures of her loving compassion. And at the hour of his departure, she added, I will appear to him clothed with radiant beauty, and will pour into his soul heavenly sweetness and consolation.

HAIL, fair Lily of the effulgent and ever-peaceful Trinity.
Hail, thou radiant Rose of heavenly fragrance,
of whom the King of Heaven did will to be born,
and with thy milk to be fed:
feed our souls with Divine infusions.
Amen.

“Will you not come some day to see me in Paris?” he (Durtal) said.

“No. I (M. Bruno the Oblate) have quitted life without any mind to return to it. I am dead to the world. I do not wish to see Paris again. I have no wish to live again.

“But if God lend me still a few years of existence I hope to see you here again, for it is not in vain that one has crossed the threshold of mystic asceticism, to verify by one’s own experience the reality of the requirements which our Lord brings about. Now, as God does not proceed by chance, He will certainly finish His work by sifting you as wheat. I venture to recommend you to try not to give way, and attempt to die in some measure to yourself, in order not to run counter to His plans. “

“I know well,” said Durtal, “that all is displaced in me, that I am no longer the same, but what frightens me is that I am now sure that the works of the Teresan school are exact …then, then … if one must pass-through the cylinders of the rolling mill which Saint John of the Cross describes….”

The door opened and Father Etienne declared, “You have not a minute to lose, if you do not wish to miss the train. “

……….

Ah, those paths at the monastery wandered in at daybreak, those paths where one day after communion, God had dilated his soul in such a fashion that it seemed no longer his own, so much had Christ plunged him in the sea of His divine infinity, swallowed him in the heavenly firmament of His person.

How renew that state of grace without communion and outside a cloister? “No; it is all over,” he concluded.

And he was seized with such an access of sadness, such an outburst of despair, that he thought of getting out at the first station, and returning to the monastery; and he had to shrug his shoulders, for his character was not patient enough nor his will firm enough, nor his body strong enough to support the terrible trials of a noviciate. Moreover, the prospect of having no cell to himself, of sleeping dressed higgledy-piggledy in a dormitory, alarmed him.

But what then? And sadly he took stock of himself.

“Ah!” he thought, “I have lived twenty years in ten days in that convent, and I leave it, my brain relaxed, my heart in rags; I am done for, for ever. Paris and Notre Dame de l’Atre have rejected me each in their turn like a waif, and here I am condemned to live apart, for I am still too much a man of letters to become a monk, and yet I am already too much a monk to remain among men of letters. “

He leapt up and was silent, dazzled by jets of electric light which flooded him as the train stopped.

He had returned to Paris.

“If they,” he said, thinking of those writers whom it would no doubt be difficult not to see again, “if they knew how inferior they are to the lowest of the lay brothers! if they could imagine how the divine intoxication of a Trappist interests me more than all their conversations and all their books! Ah! Lord, that I might live, live in the shadow of the prayers of humble Brother Simeon!”

THE END

……….

“Here is the piggery,” continued M. Bruno, showing a tumble-down old place in front of the left wing of the cloister…

“I warn you, the old man grunts like a pig, but he will not answer your questions except by signs. “

“But he can speak to his animals?”

“Yes, to them only.”

The oblate opened a small door, and the lay brother, all bent, lifted his head with difficulty.

“Good-day, brother,” said M. Bruno; “here is a gentleman who would like to see your pupils. “

There was a grunt of joy on the lips of the old monk. He smiled and invited them by a sign to follow him.

He introduced them into a shed, and Durtal recoiled, deafened by horrible cries, suffocated by the pestilential heat of the liquid manure. All the pigs jumped up behind their barrier, and howled with joy at the sight of the brother.

“Peace, peace,” said the old man, in a gentle voice; and lifting an arm over the paling, he caressed the snouts which, on smelling him, were almost suffocated by grunting.

He drew Durtal aside by the arm, and making him lean over the trellis work, showed him an enormous sow with a snub nose, of English breed, a monstrous animal surrounded by a company of sucking pigs which rushed, as if mad, at her teats.

“Yes, my beauty; go, my beauty,” murmured the old monk, stroking her bristles with his hand.

And the sow looked at him with little languishing eyes, and licked his fingers; she ended by screaming abominably when he went away.

And Brother Simeon showed off other pupils, pigs with ears like the mouth of a trumpet and corkscrew tails, sows whose stomachs trailed and whose feet seemed hardly outside their bodies, new-born pigs which sucked ravenously at the teats, larger ones, who delighted in chasing each other about and rolled in the mud, snorting.

Durtal complimented him on the beasts, and the old monk was jubilant, wiping his face with his great hand…..

“Brother Simeon is an angelic being, ” replied the oblate. “He lives the Unitive life, his soul plunged, drowned in the divine essence. Under a rough exterior an absolutely white soul, a soul without sin, lives in this poor body; it is right that God should spoil him! As I have told you, He has given him all power over the Demon; and in certain cases He allows him also the power of healing by the imposition of hands. He has renewed here the wonderful cures of the ancient saints. “

They ceased speaking, and, warned by the bells which were ringing for Vespers, they moved towards the church. –J.K. Huysmans ‘En Route’

spacer
spacer

River flowing and a still pond

And the oblate went up to his cell, while Durtal went towards the large pond. There he lay down on a bed of dry reed, looking at the water which broke in wavelets at his feet. The coming and going of these limited waters, folding back on themselves, yet never overpassing the basin they had hollowed for themselves, led him on into long reveries.

He said to himself that a river was the most exact symbol of the active life; one follows it from its source through all its courses across the territories it fertilizes; it has fulfilled its assigned task before it dies, immersing itself in the gaping sepulcher of the seas; but the pond, that tamed water, imprisoned in a hedge of reeds which it has itself caused to grow in fertilizing the soil of its bank, has concentrated itself, lived on itself, not seemed to achieve any known work, save to keep silence and reflect on the infinite of heaven.

“Still water troubles me,” continued Durtal. “It seems to me that unable to extend itself, it grows deeper, and that while running waters borrow only the shadows of things they reflect, it swallows them giving them back. Most certainly in this pond is a continued and profound absorption of forgotten clouds, of lost trees, even of sensations seized on the faces of monks who hung over it. This water is full, and not empty, like those which are distracted in wandering about the country and in bathing the towns. It is a contemplative water, in perfect accord with the recollected life of the cloisters.

“The fact is,” he concluded, “that a river would have here no meaning; it would only be passing, would remain indifferent and in a hurry, would be in all cases unfit to pacify the soul which the monastic water of the ponds appeases. Ah! in founding Notre Dame de l’Atre, Saint Bernard knew how to fit the Cistercian rule and the site. –J.K. Huysmans ‘En Route’

spacer