‘Interiority’ implies self-acceptance. The desired interiority means that fully functioning, self-actualizing, fully human people not only are aware of physical, psychological, and spiritual hungers and activities, but also accept them as good. Such people are “at home” with their bodies, their tender as well as hostile emotions, their impulses, thoughts, and desires.

Not only are fully human people “at home” with what they have already experienced within themselves, but they are open to new sensations, new and deeper emotional reactions, changing thoughts and desires. They accept their inner condition as forever changing, since growth always involves change. Their ultimate destiny as human beings, that is, what they will become at the end of their lives, is delightfully unknown….Their potential selves, newly actualized every day by new experiences, cannot possibly be defined at any one stage of their growth.

Full human people accept what they are, physically, emotionally, and intellectually. They know that they are, as far as it is known to them, good. They know that their potential selves are even greater. They are, however realistic about their limitations; they do not dwell in dreams of what they want to be and spend the rest of their lives convincing themselves that they are these things. They have listened to, explored and loved what they actually are. And each new day this experience of themselves will be as new as the day itself because they are forever changing, self-renovating personality. They trust their own abilities and resources, confident that they can adapt to and cope with all the challenges that their lives will present.

This kind of self-acceptance empowers people to live fully and confidentially with all that goes on inside them. They are afraid of nothing that is or a part of themselves.

Exteriority implies an openness not only to the self within but to the environment without. Fully human people are in deep and meaningful contact with the world outside themselves, to the voices of their world. The breadth of their own individual experience is infinitely multiplied through a sensitive empathy with others. They suffer with the suffering, rejoice with the joyful. They are born again in every springtime, feel the impact of the great mysteries of life: birth, growth, love, suffering, death. Their hearts skip along with the “young lovers” and they know something of the exhilaration that is in them. They also know the ghetto’s philosophy of despair, the loneliness of suffering without relief. The bell never tolls without tolling in some strange way for them.

“Create in me, O God, a listening heart,” the psalmist prays.

The opposite of this openness is a type of “defensiveness.” This defensiveness hears only what it wants to hear, according to its own preconceived structure and bias. It sees only what it wants to see. Defensive people cannot be growing persons because their world is no bigger than themselves, and the circle of their horizons is tightly closed.

‘Exteriority’ reaches its peak in the ability to ‘give love freely,’…an absolute need to be loved (infancy) toward a full readiness to give love (maturity), with all sorts of stages in between…the unions of love, points out two pitfalls that can stifle human growth: a complacent satisfaction that settles for that which already is, and, at the other extreme, a restless activity that goes from distraction to distraction in search of something beyond. The result…is always self-estrangement. In love we must possess and savor that which is, and simultaneously reach out to possess (to love) the good more fully. This is the balance achieved by full human beings. It is the balance between “what is” and “what is to come”.

Fully human beings, in their love, do not identify themselves with what they love, so these loved things are not extensions of themselves. Gabriel Marcel, in his book ‘Being and Having’ laments that our civilization teaches us how to take possessions of things, when it should rather initiate us in the art of letting go. There is neither freedom nor real life without an apprenticeship in dispossession. Father John Powell ‘Why Am I Afraid to Tell You Who I Am?’.

Reading the words, instructed to read the words through relations with a group of amiable men seeking self-improvement, I embrace the reading effort, yet there is a leeriness. The malleability defined by Father Powell is welcomed. The acceptance and comprehending of limitations, understanding who I am within the rejecting of delusion and negativity, wonders if the term ‘fully human being’ is necessary. The establishing of this breathing and walking marvel of human magnificence appears idealistic, attached to potentialities of grandeur rather than honesty and humility. Cautious of defensiveness, I recognize it is not who I am. Father Powell’s words: “They are afraid of nothing that is or a part of themselves” are distant to me. I cannot embrace them. I am aware they can be explained, yet I do not feel safe with the idea. I am afraid of many of my thoughts. I am afraid where my thoughts have taken me in the past, realizing the possibility of self-destruction. With respect and love, I am fearful of myself. Avoiding negativity, seeking truth, I contemplate the scandals in Father Powell’s life. The lack of sexual boundaries with women he was tendering care to seemingly points to a mindset emboldened with a sense of false truth, a confidence bolstered by the idea of infallibility. Based solely upon intention, a feel-good pursuit of comforting interaction, I would suspect his indiscretions were not so much a selfish quest for pleasure, although in honesty that must be recognized as a part of it, the underlying motivation, I am confident, was a misguided effort to bring a deeper meaning into another’s life. With growth in mind, I think a fear of ourselves is healthy when revealing the love of God within our lives. We don’t need to look longingly toward the idea of “fully human beings’ as inspiration and potentialities, rather a surrender to mystery, a loving appreciation of the Divine, the perfection of God, and the stimulus of a dogmatically proclaimed human perfection in Our Loving Mother. In prayer, we can contemplatively move outward with meekness to Mary’s husband Joseph, beholden to the saints. Anyway, thoughts for now. In order to be a ‘fully human being’, maybe we need to lose the idea of being fully human.

No Mass for two days, I was rewarded with a splendid endeavor at St John the Evangelist in Streamwood, Illinois. A full choir and band on Halloween Wednesday, a pre-celebration for All Saints day. A communal Rosary before Mass, plentiful attendance, allowed a resting within meaningful peace. It is gratifying to be amongst believers glorifying the Lord. Tomorrow the Church will provide Eucharistic Adoration before and after Mass. God is good.

I am waiting in the Chicago O’Hare airport, after a late Sunday morning flight. Everything went remarkably smooth, the flight seemingly over not too long after take-off. Now complications will most likely arise. The other four gentleman meeting me all flew into Midway airport, thirty-two miles south, and then we drive fifty-three miles southwest to Joliet. The others texted that their flight was late in taking off. As I sit waiting in Chicago, they have not even left Cleveland. It appears I will have a plentitude of time people watching at the airport. I find the fact appealing. A mother and teenage daughter, sharing a fine form of loving communication, laughing and joking constantly with one another, has just departed the adjoining seats. An oriental stewardess takes their place. Before the outbound flight, I was able to attend an early Mass at St Charles. Once again, I am struck by the profoundness I am experiencing attending Mass with a full church of parishioners. The families, the elderly, the gathering of people allows detachment, a pulling away from myself, a pleasing feeling of love. Currently, I am being overwhelmed with recovery efforts—a lot is coming at me. I accept the challenge of allowing a multitude of input, while outputting little. Humbly, I allow influences to emerge, and others to pass by. Silently, I try to acquiesce. There is no doubt my center is Mass, the summit of my prayer life. The reality of who I am is concrete, meaningful, and distinct during Mass. I view the process of my life, including the failures and struggles—possibly through them the most—a trudging toward the light, an embracing of God. During Mass, I did become pouty with myself, speculating about realities. I thought of my past, remembering the difficulties. I wondered why God did not guide me to a stable life within the Church. There is no place that brings such peace. Why did I wander so far? During Mass today, within the congregation, I observed women of faith, humbly dedicated to their families and community. Why did a broken young lady materialize as my first love? The heart break and immersion into sin during and after the relationship nearly did me in. I am still recovering. Realizing my first romantic love may not be going back far enough, I whined to myself while awaiting the Eucharist. Why didn’t God draw me immediately and intimately into the Church? It was there I belonged. The religious life or the life of a faithful father and husband are obviously the avenue a properly formed young man would have pursued. Yet that was not who I was. Possessing a stout faith, I was determined to open wide the gates of the world, nearly, and prayerfully not, the gates of hell, all in the name of seeking the life of an artist. Possessing mediocre talent, lacking a serious work ethic, plus being emotionally and psychologically broken, nothing substantial amounted from the grievous endeavor. The fascinated young man who read Hermann Hesse’s ‘Demain’ with a passion inherently needed to experience the world; to discover and appease himself with the possibility he may possess a unique vision. There were things that I could not avoid. Delusion drove forward, enlightening through sorrow, disappointment, addiction and severity. I can only be grateful for the protection God provided, the anchoring and guidance provided by my Holy Mother. Now looking back, it is obvious I never stood a chance. Struggle and strife were the only paths I was capable of creating. There was no way prosperity and stability could establish itself. I reflect upon my time with the Franciscan order, comprehending my proliferation within the rigorous prayer life, while unable to adapt to the emotional and psychological demands of community life. It was not long before internally I was warring with others. My thoughts while alone, away from prayer, were lonely, desperate, and ugly. Within a religious order, I became singular, an isolated being—a soul vulnerable to Satan. Unable to properly seek spiritual guidance, unable to communicate, it was not long before I was walking away, my obstinate pride leading the way. Deficient in coping mechanisms, I stubbornly rejected a life that gave me a sense of peace and depth never known before, a way of life that introduced the means of advanced prayer that grace allowed access to. There were things that needed to be addressed, and I did not have the means to address them. Rebellion, a contentious and fighting nature ruled my thoughts, and thus my behavior. I could not cease the dissenting. I could not quiet my argumentative mind. The struggles continued, within a life devoted and loving God, I could not find peace. Anger and wrath were my natural expression. I recall living with my rescuer, screaming at her so relentlessly that I piercingly gave myself a splitting headache. It was not about being right. Attached to a codependent and obsessive idea of love, the core of my being poured forth rage. Now I sit at the O’Hare airport watching people, the majority reflections in the street viewing window, distinct where the window is darkened. One of the gentleman emerging (I posted his photo) will be guiding me through the book ‘Why am I Afraid to Tell You Who I Am?’ Under the direction of another, he recently exercised his way through the book. Now the student becomes the teacher. My teacher he will become. I trust the gentleman. His unassuming, smiling nature, instantly disarms. I turned around for the exchanging of peace yesterday at St Paul Shrine, my eyes locking onto this wonderful face seated directly behind me. I knew I knew the man. It took a concentrated stare and the reception of a smile before the realization set in that it was Dennis wishing me peace. He was not wearing his glasses. I look forward to sharing a reading and recovery experience with Dennis. Together, we will explore the writing of Jesuit priest John Powell. Conducting research on Father Powell, I was saddened to discover complexity. I will link to a EWTN Women of Grace post for further examination. Life is truly a struggle.

My person is not a little hard core inside of me, a little fully formed state that is real and authentic, permanent and fixed. My person rather implies a dynamic process. In other words, if you knew me yesterday, please do not think that I am the same person that you are meeting today.

I have experienced more of life, I have encountered new depths in those I love, I have suffered and prayed, and I am different.

Please do not give me a “batting average,” fixed and irrevocable, because I am “in there” constantly, taking my swings at the opportunities of daily living. Approach me, then, with a sense of wonder, study my face and hands and voice for the signs of change; for it is certain that I have changed. But even if you do not recognize this, I may be somewhat afraid to tell you who I am. –‘Why am I Afraid to Tell You Who I Am?” Father John Powell.

I worked sixty hours last week, six days ten hours each. It is a return to the immense hours I have been working for decades. Carefully, I observe myself, checking thoughts and priorities. Exhausted by a lack of sleep, staying awake to attend a Big Book meeting and then Mass at St Paul Shrine, I was surprised by a lunch invitation, extending myself further with an accepting. The lunch proved splendid. The gentleman inviting, Big Myron, has been a presence over the last several weeks. He is a college professor, cultured and world traveled having been to the Lourdes grotto twenty-one times. His devotion to the Eucharist is authentic, practical in approach based upon healing. He explained he was meeting with two other men to discuss codependency. His friend, the man in the photo, took the lead, once assigned by Big Myron. He was told one learned best by teaching. Thoughtfully, he read form the book: ‘Codependent No More’. The fourth man was a retired priest. He presented the question whether one could be codependent upon religion. The discussion moved to the topic of solitude contrasted with loneliness and self-loathing. I am pleased to recognize a new group of male friends. We will meet on Fridays and Saturdays. Fridays discussing Aristotle, Augustine, and Aquinas, while Saturday is open for a concentration upon codependency. I appreciated Big Myron’s focus upon applying knowledge to daily living. I was astounded he possessed intimate knowledge of the writing and life of J.K. Huysmans. His familiarity with Lourdes, recently reading Huysmans expound upon the naturalist French writer, a contemporary, Emile Zola writing about his experience at Lourdes, made me bring up the movie ‘Lourdes’—a precious movie in my mind. The film is a realistic approach to Lourdes. Within the miracles and wonder, a pragmatism touches. I recommended the movie to Big Myron, stressing an effort going beyond dogma and into transformation. He turned to the other men exclaiming they must watch it. Once again, I watched the movie this morning. I decided to repost a post I did after the initial viewing.

I love the ending of this movie ‘Lourdes’. The underplay of dramatics sweeps my heart subtly into profoundness. Obedience witnessed. The entire movie is touching with its minimized need for grand pronouncements, or the vanity of declarative statements. The lack of action and emotion promotes honesty; moving the heart with simplicity, stimulating the mind with wonder. Christine, a charming young woman with multiple sclerosis, experiences a miracle visiting Lourdes. During the middle of the night, unseen, away from the crowds, lacking any form of melodramatics, she rises from her bed and walks into the bathroom to fix her hair. She miraculously gains the use of her legs, able to walk, while seemingly embarrassed for experiencing such a tremendous miracle. Not in the least does she receive the miracle with dramatics, loud proclaiming, nor tears aplenty. Preceding the final scene, she dances with the young man the French nurses all admire. She falls while dancing. The final scene with her mother, after the fall on the dance floor, at first refusing the wheelchair her mother offers, the captivating, beautiful young woman watches and listens to everything before her. The passion within her culminates. It is obvious. She wants to dance. She wants to sing. She wants to love a young man. She wants to be like the nurses, similar young women her age enjoying health and life, able to give to those less fortunate. Within all her heart, within every ounce of her being, within all her understanding, she wants to live life to its fullest as a normal young lady. Her chest heaves, she struggles so deeply with all of her passions, passions that are not evil. In the end, she concedes, acquiescing to the wishes of God. Disarming with her understated eloquence, she accepts. If it is meant for her to be in a wheelchair so be it. She sits in the wheelchair, the scene framed in blackness. Miracles are not necessary for her happiness, her faith. Mysteries are left mysteries. Happy or sad worldly endings are not witnessed as finality. I like the final comment by one of the two older women at the dining table. ‘Do you think there’ll be a dessert’? The movie fades to black as the singing continues with the delightfully catchy French pop song. The will of God is left uninterpreted, darkness regarding ultimate answers remain unanswered. That is a tremendous scene of faith. The faith St John of the Cross writes of in the above quote.

…appreciate…feelings he has had about his relationships…honesty…disappointment and pain…sharing prompted me to reflect on my own ways of relating to people and…my own experiences…an internal longing for certain types of relationships and contact with people…it makes sense to assume that I may have some unusual patterns of relationships with people in general…my expectations of friendships, I think, are not always healthy…I just wanted to be deep friends long before it was socially normal…

In normal, healthy relationships this is a slow and natural process (it could happen or it might not happen, depending on whether we eventually found us to be mutually compatible–there is no pressure). But for me, it was like I was desperate to be close because I was expecting so much from the relationship. I wanted to force it to happen. The minute I called or sent an email, I would wait all day hoping for a response. If the response took a bit longer, I would be disappointed and read all kinds of things into it…“Maybe I am not liked.” “Maybe I am inferior.” Or if the lack of response happened too many times, I would criticize (attack)…”He is an undependable person.” “He doesn’t know how to have a close friendship.”

When we made arrangements to get together, I would be thinking about it all week. And when we met, I would be listening intently for any sign of affirmation in the conversation to show how he valued our relationship. I wasn’t just enjoying the friendship. I was using it to meet some deep unmet internal need. That is unfair and unhealthy and a lot of pressure to put on a regular friendship.

Fortunately, I was socially mature enough on the outside to know to keep all this to myself…inside, I was full of all this turmoil. If I were honest with myself, I would know that I was clingy and obsessed and desperate for connection…In the end I never became a deep friend…programmed to either seek a deep friend or none at all…I wasn’t satisfied with a normal everyday friendship where we might connect every few weeks or months or at any interval that was mutually good for both of us, even if it were just once a year. It had to fit the ideal in MY mind…I am healthier now and understand some of those dynamics…I have much healthier expectations of my relationships now. But I know that I am always susceptible to such tendencies, so I always try to check myself.

…I have encountered some who also have the clinginess…some who are self-absorbed, unable to take in points of view that differ from their own…some who don’t understand the basics of keeping up a regular periodic dialogue…the relationship dies…some who are overly demanding about relationships…We all have backgrounds with pain and hurts that affects the way we interact with people…need for healing…trying to honestly look in the mirror and face my own unhealthy views and expectations of relationships…trying to have honest, healthy interactions with people…tried to be realistic…Not everyone is skilled at having healthy relationships…that doesn’t mean we dislike them…they are on their journey and they may not have the skills to be a good friend at this time…

………………

Thank you…exactly the kinds of exchanges that give me life…never met in person…connecting…mutually relate…fellow human beings…a tendency to read the other person’s problem as a reflection of me…people often disappoint…

I used to look for that one good friend to satisfy all my friendship needs. I wanted that deep, intimate bosom buddy who took the time to know me well, who knew how to encourage me when I needed, who took the right level of initiative in our friendship, who was interesting, who had similar interests…I could never find the one person to meet this crazy criteria…differently…Instead of finding the one friend…satisfy all my needs…I diversify and accept people for what they are and accept what I can get from each person…No one individual satisfies me…the composite of them together has helped me have a fuller life…not overly desperate with any single one…You said “don’t throw me away.”…I’ve had this exact phrase play in my mind all the time, “throw me away” “toss me aside” “make me feel like I don’t count.”…I have learned that I often overread situations…When someone doesn’t respond to my overtures for friendship in the way I wish, such voices play in my mind…these sorts of thoughts are distortions that come from my childhood hurts…read situations in terms of rejection and non-acceptance….It is not a personal rejection or a criticism of me…don’t “fit” together at this moment in time…areas needing healing, but God did not make a mistake…

………………

Thoughtful and honest, an increasing of self-knowledge leading to surrender–soul expanding reading. I have a friend, an academic, a language specialist and self-acclaimed Christian philosopher/psychologist. He teaches a fundamental and debilitating obstacle for growing in Jesus Christ is self-loathing. The core of our psyche is diabolically attacked by the Father of Lies to form us in a way in which we despise ourselves. As children, within all the love, care, and concern of our parents or maybe in a cruel absence of love (abuse), experience springboards us into disappointment, a movement away from love. Our teen years and young adulthood only hardens and inflates the obstacle—the distance. We cannot accept ourselves—loneliness becomes perpetual. The self-loathing, the lack of trust in ourselves, submerges into our deepest dispositions, emotions, thoughts and thus behavior. We grow foolish, unstable, unable to mature due to unsound psychological needs. The instinctive reaction to turn on one’s self becomes subtler and grows. We become desperate and expect too much, lacking an inability to be honest with ourselves—to truly know ourselves as the Creator knows us. Patterns develop that lead to addiction, codependency, and other forms of frustration. I have decided it would be best to end with words sent to me by an individual here in Courage:

After reading your not-so-hopeful message, I was just prompt to mention to you that no matter how damaged/warped you think you are, nothing is impossible to Jesus since His Grace can, did and will do anything for you as it did for many of us and many throughout the history of Christianity. We cannot change or do anything by ourselves – I agree, but by belief in His Grace, with Him and through Him – all things are possible, remember this. Please pray for His Grace to transform you. ‘For with God nothing will be impossible.” Luke 1:37

A Saturday reflection, again enjoying three days off from work. The personal time is pleasing, while challenging. I am spending a lot of free time in my new home alone, watching television and reading. My thoughts border always on the extreme, waiting impatiently for something to worry about. I am convinced I can control my thinking, settling myself down, aiming myself toward peace and contentment. Recovery focuses my thoughts upon exercises prescribed by my sponsor. Today, sharing a Big Book meeting, the idea of creating personal space, distance from others, while concentrating upon where I am at and where I am going. I recognize my contentious nature in dealing with the sponsor one-on-one. We speak daily. My obstinate nature seeks self-improvement. The man is sound and structured in his approach, following specific methods based upon experience. Opinions and beliefs are placed aside, at least to the best of our abilities: Part of a prayer he suggests: …Today, God we humbly ask for your direction, care, wisdom guidance, and love as we walk through these steps…and God please set aside everything we think we know about ourselves, the steps, the books, sobriety and you God…and God please help each and every one of us today to have an open mind so that we may have a new experience and discover the truth…. The idea of creating space, separation if necessary from those closest is essential. That void, assisted with impartial guidance, allows the formation of a new truth, a freed discernment struggling with itself rather than others. The detachment is different than the feel-good opposite extreme of self-effacement in which I declare ‘I am the problem’. To fall prostrate, surrendering under the guise, that my being wrong means others are right is set aside. Acceptance without judgement penetrates deeper. I examine myself, scrutinizing myself under the tutelage of another. It is not important to accept absolute culpability, nor to determine, in the slightest degree, the faults of others. It is not easy. Even with the sponsor, I will find myself internally attacking him. It is not difficult to find error. Regarding God, he introduced me to the God of his understanding, showing me a photo on his phone of a mother grizzly bear with three cubs perched upon her back. He explained how he saw the male grizzly bear as his God. I did not confront with the obvious observation that it was a female. Male grizzlies do not care for cubs. If anything, a male will kill the cubs. He went into a serious elaboration on why he saw the adult grizzly as God and himself as one of the cubs. Placing things in order, his perspective on religion does not matter. His role in my life is to assist me with recovery, a life of sobriety. I respect his intelligence, yet overall it is his organized approach to recovery that establishes him as a man I trust in regard to guiding me through the steps. There seems to be a gleam in his eye at times when stressing that it I must realize I will have to establish a whole new understanding of God. It would be easy to become defensive, comprehending there is something within him that would take pleasure in seeing me reject Catholicism. He was raised a Catholic. He is now proud to proclaim he has found a better way to form a personal relationship with God than the religion of his upbringing. I am not threatened, nor feel the need to debate. I explained that my new understanding of God would be centered upon establishing God as a daily means of embracing life. Internally and without being spoken, there is the absolute conviction I would never abandon, nor consider abandoning Catholicism. However, a new understanding and embracing would be welcomed. Religion, for myself, has included a rejection of life. My latest fascination with J.K.Huysmans delves deeply into such a spiritual pursuit. I have no doubt, and signs are apparent, that such a path is a true one for myself. Yet to strengthen that path, I must respond positively and productively to life. God wants progress on the natural level before grace deepens. Detachment is only healthy when one strives to serve God through his brothers, sisters, and the world. When creation is respected, and lived within honestly, humbly, and realistically, only then can grace emerge triumphant. The astute aspect of the sponsor’s charism is his ability to penetrate toward one’s true motivation. I contrast his approach to the originating group welcoming me to Cleveland. I identify the difference between feel-good sentiment, settling for easy group confirmed answers, opposed to a deeper insight determined to reveal enveloping truth—an efficient means of maturing. I can pinpoint matters with a focus upon mothers. With the original group, we discussed relationships with our mothers. They settled upon feel-good sentiment, emotional candy, telling stories how individually they hurt their mothers, accepting all blame, while emotionally proclaiming the immensity of their errant ways. Discussing the matter with my sponsor, I was surprised when he said he did not explain his relationship with his mother amidst recovery crowds. After serious deliberation, including consolation with his sponsor and wife, plus years of sobriety, he discerned he would not allow his mother an intimate role in his life. He approached her thoughtfully and carefully at family gatherings, while holding her constantly in his prayers, yet he would not allow her an active voice in his life. Throughout their relationship she trended toward chaos and drama, involving herself in criminal behavior when he was young. Time after time, she had demonstrated an inability to change; hurting and wounding her son after a lifetime of scaring. The door could be opened; however, he doubted the matter. He would not allow negative relationships to dominate his life. With his mother there was no middle ground, therefore separation was demanded. I make no judgements, nor verdicts. I respect his willingness to go above and beyond in order to establish a deeper embracing of truth. I think of my mother content with the distance we currently suffer. I will be patient, concentrating upon myself. I think of two female relationships important to me; emotional and difficult. Both pull deeply, lovingly, and longingly upon my heartstrings. I accept the distance, pointing no fingers away from myself, grateful for God’s loving whole-hearted attention. The sponsor told me of his thirty-year marriage, the fact his wife is in the program, and that when they both sought relief from alcoholism they separated. He came to understand how codependent they both were. It took the act of letting go of his wife before he could embrace her properly. It took his wife the act of letting go of him before she could accept his embrace with a mature and healthy love. This week they will celebrate their thirtieth anniversary. I am a witness to a new way of doing things, a new relationship with God emerging. I accept people for who they are, expecting nothing from them. All I can do is work upon myself, increasing my capacity for love with a renewed devotion and all-embracing relationship with God. I stop fighting with every and anything. The surrender of my will is in truth a tearful act of purging; a necessary act of healing. How in the world did I sustain fighting so much throughout my life? My sponsor told me about his first year of sobriety, and how he lived in a cloud of haze, sloth, and stupor. Looking back, he learned there was a physical and chemical component to the matter. His thought patterns, his brain patterns, were physically addicted, structured, to adrenalin rushes and an indulgence in the production of pleasure producing neurotransmitters: dopamine, serotonin, endorphins, and oxytocin. After a lifetime of substance abuse, his brain had to find a new way of functioning. His explanation assisted me in coming to terms with my dark and slothful moments when alone. During work, times of prayer: Mass, reading, and times of entertainment, I can function efficiently, able to achieve moments of peak production. However, left alone everything can become a struggle. Socializing is important to my well-being. Hospice work entered my life once again. Several received phone calls brought the matter to light. I went through an orientation process with a Catholic hospice organization, delighted to experience a smile producing relationship with the tutoring gentleman. He is an articulate witty man skilled as a caregiver. During the training, three of us wandered the halls of the hospice, seeking individuals to visit. The gentleman is scrupulous when discerning individuals to approach. He made it clear he only went where he was welcome, always open and attentive for a refusal. I relate it to the ancient Greek axiom: a kindness unwanted is no kindness at all. Consulting with a nurse we learned of two rooms hosting individuals who might be receptive to visitors. The first room provided a woman deeply asleep. We determined it was not wise to wake the woman. The next room I recognized upon approach. The man, seated and eating with a hooded sweatshirt drawn over his head, caught my attention when we walked by as his beaming eyes looked to those passing his room. We quickly established a joyful conversation with the man. The tutor commented the man looked like a monk. He responded he was cold. He continued eating his chicken while informing us of his preferences for movies. He surprised us by sitting up and drawing his hood away from his head, asking for our appraisal of his new haircut. I had to admit his head full of finely washed hair looked well groomed and attractive. He told us how a friend took him to his regular barber in Strongsville. It was obvious the trip away from the hospice did him very well. He said he was pleased with the haircut, yet now understood his beard stubble needed attention. He vowed he would shave that very afternoon. It was not long before I realized how much I missed hospice work, and the fact one received immensely when giving. I received no calls this weekend, while looking forward to filling my weekly three days off with hospice work. Another socializing incident caused reflection. After Mass and a Holy Hour on Friday at St Paul Shrine, I fell into a political discussion with three men in the lobby. The four of us were on the same page, yet overall I felt I could have behaved better. I am convinced in these divisive chaotic times no one is served by seeking like minded individuals and bashing perceived opponents. One of the men was highly intelligent, sickly in appearance, yet obviously a cultured and well-educated man. I thoroughly enjoyed conversation with him. Today during communal prayers, he joined us, while sitting distant. Possibly I am wrong, yet I feel I have piqued his interest. Our leader Shirley informed me of the man’s identity. He has been formerly brought to my attention under the moniker of Big Myron. I am curious now to pursue further conversation. I am confident he will be familiar with J.K. Huysmans. Finally, regarding socializing, St Charles Borromeo charmed today. The call for reconciliation brought me to the church for an early evening visit while a Mass was in the process of dismissing. I seated myself waiting for the attending priest. A young mother stopped close, conducting some type of information gathering effort guided by a child’s Catholic religious publication. The mother and her three children were venturing about the church, seeking out pieces of the church the educational magazine asked them to identify. They stopped at the reconciliation booths and the mother checked off their successful discovery. She asked her children if they knew what the booths were for. A young boy answered it was where you went when you were bad. The mother responded not necessarily bad, rather we sought confession when we acted in ways that were selfish, mean, and against the ways God wanted us to behave. She asked her children to think about times when they behaved in ways that were not recognized as bad, yet still they knew they were not good. She went on to explain the oldest boy would soon be making his first confession. As they moved on to the next item on their search list, heading toward the alter, I noticed a father trailing behind holding a new born, eyes bright and observing. Of course, me being prone to tears, it was not easy hold back an effusion.

Today Mass soothed. I failed to mention that yesterday, missing a retreat Mass, I headed directly to St Bridgette. A parish I had never experienced brought peace through the sacredness of Mass. This morning sleeping late, I attended the noon Mass at St Charles Borromeo. The conviction concretized that I would celebrate Sunday Mass at St Charles. St Paul Shrine has blessed with incredible grace, yet now I identify the time to establish a personal parish. St Paul Shrine will be there for daily Mass and communal prayer. On Sundays, I need families, children, neighbors, fellowship to deepen my faith. ‘It is not good for the man to be alone’. My alienated existence is a state to overcome. Today, a young woman alone with her three children sat off to my left, directly in front of me. The two young girls were beautiful and peaceful, one occupying her time creating things with silly puddy. I was hypnotized at moments, smiling when I comprehended one of her configurations was a smiling face. The energetic youngest brother, a toddler, was quite ambitious with his frolicking. During the Eucharistic preparation, he was quiet during the singing and responses, while finding the silence of the priest’s recitation—the producing of the miracle of transformation—an ideal time to be heard by all. I could only chuckle, delighted with the secretive opportunity to share time with ones so young. “Let the children come to me; do not prevent them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. Amen, I say to you, whoever does not accept the kingdom of God like a child will not enter it.” I also signed up for a Saturday retreat on October 20th, an all-day affair. The young man signing me up bragged about his coming wedding this Saturday, and a honeymoon touring Europe with stops in Italy, Germany, and Hungary. ‘That is why a man leaves his father and mother and clings to his wife, and the two of them become one flesh.’ I spoke with my sponsor before Mass, grateful for his structured wisdom. We discussed the fact I became so obsessed after the Jesuit Retreat, argumentative in mind and spirit. Exercising penetrating honesty, we concluded that I must check political thought. I relate the matter to the writing of Archbishop of Philadelphia Charles Chaput, a Native American. He stressed that America was not established as a Catholic nation. The mantle of Mary was never sought as a protecting grace. In fact, Catholics were persecuted in the early years of the United States. I accept that my Catholic faith must not be dependent upon the state of the nation. There must be a detachment from political conditions. It is absolutely necessary. Jesus never sought a revolution against Rome. He even aligned with Rome, acknowledging its worthiness, when he proclaimed none possessed a greater faith than the Centurion who confessed his home was not worthy to host Our Lord. ‘Give back to Cesar what is Cesar’s; and to God what is God’s’. Within complexity, Rome advanced civilization, producing peace—Pax Romana plus engineering, arts, politics, entertainment/sports. Rome advanced the impressive accomplishments of the Greeks. Spiritual victory does not find a home in political revolution. I think of the personally formative novel ‘Demian’ by Hermann Hesse. The main character, a young man being formed, spiritually progresses as he humbly and obediently accepts the tumultuous times of war. Yesterday, I witnessed those whose spiritual life was strangled by their obsession with politics. Politics dominated their disposition and peace. I must recognize the warning provided by God. My sponsor and I shared the reality, as he expressed that he and his wife concluded that they would remain knowledgeable, active through voting, while emotionally and socially creating political detachment. Their opinions would not influence their lives or relationships. They would remain open to everyone. That openness would not be the passive aggressive elevating of one’s self through the spiritual manipulating I witnessed yesterday; the idea of remaining aloof, praying for opponents while stripping them of dignity. I thought a lot about another factor that disturbed me. Educators, the Jesuits I beneficially and gratefully spent time with, stressed several times the formation of young people into what I consider social justice warriors. There is something insidious in the reality, a disturbing trend right out of the novel ‘Lord of the World’. Young people are at a time of growth, spiritually benefitted with the virtues of obedience, humility, and discipline. I think of the old school image of a school teaching nun busting the knuckles of a youngster with a ruler. Now we have educators who befriend young people, empowering them with the concentration their ideas are powerful and must be expressed adamantly. They are taught they are a political force, while in truth they are naïve and ruled by emotions. The young protestors unleashed by liberals do not only impair a mature political consciousness, they themselves are spiritually crippled. Improper formation is guiding them to become arrogant and pretentious at a time they should become humble, disciplined, and obedient to wisdom greater than themselves. What is happening on many college campuses is deeply troubling. I recall reading an angry editorial by a college professor from the University of Toledo. The veteran professor stressed that huge sums of money are being funneled into academia through grants and student loans, and the fact many of the students populating college campuses do not academically belong there. A dumbing down is being enacted. The professor stressed he feared his name being found out for there existed a ruthless mentality amongst the university. Individuals were not allowed to speak their minds. Keep in mind these are worldly individuals who will vehemently identify capitalism as corrupt. Regarding students, many will never graduate, and many more who do graduate will be burdened with huge student loan debt, while skill-wise and emotionally unprepared for a vocation. The care and concern for the young people being utilized as political weapons, not only ignores their spiritual needs, it also hampers their financial situation, while doubling the impact by denying them the means to attain gainful employment. Should we wonder why so many concede to a socialist world—the embracing of ‘The Lord of the World’. I cannot envision how anyone involved in the education system as it exists today could be spiritually comfortable with the institutions they inhabit. ‘Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe to stumble, it would be better for him if, with a heavy millstone hung around his neck, he had been cast into the sea.’ Anyway enough. There is enough on my plate. My faith, proper healing, my employment, and fellowship are concerns vital to spiritual growth. As my sponsor says, the rest should merely be entertainment. Fake it at first, if that is the best you can do.