Communion; aftertaste

The moment of Communion was at hand. The little boy had gently thrown the white napkin back on the table; the nuns and poor women and peasants went forward, all with clasped hands and bowed heads, and the child took a taper and passed in front of the priest, his eyes almost shut for fear of seeing the Host.

There was in this little creature such a glow of love and reverence that Durtal gazed with admiration and trembled with awe. Without in the least knowing why, in the midst of the darkness that fell on his soul, of the impotent and wavering feeling that thrilled it without there being any word to describe them, he felt a tide bearing him to the Saviour, and then a recoil.

The comparison was inevitably forced upon him between that child’s soul and his own. “Why, it is he, not I, who should take the Sacrament!” cried he to himself; and he crouched there inert, his hands folded, not knowing how to decide, in a frame at once beseeching and terrified, when he felt himself gently drawn to the table and received the Sacrament. And meanwhile he was trying to collect himself, and to pray, and at the same time, at the same instant, was in the discomfort of the shuddering fears that surge up within us, and that find expression physically in a craving for air, and in that peculiar condition when the head feels as if it were empty, as if the brain had ceased to act, and all vitality was driven back on the heart, which swells to choking; when it seems, in the spiritual sense, that as energy returns so far as to allow of self-command once more, of introspection, we peer down in appalling silence into a black void.

He painfully rose and returned to his place, not without stumbling. Never, not even at Chartres, had he been able to hinder the torpor that overpowered him at the moment of receiving the Sacrament. His powers were benumbed, his faculties arrested.

In Paris, at the core of his soul, which seemed rolled up in itself like a chrysalis, there had always been a sort of restraint, an awkwardness in waiting, and in approaching Christ, and then an apathy which nothing could shake off. And this state was prolonged in a sort of cold, enveloping mist, or rather in a vacuum all round the soul, deserted and swooning on its couch.

At Chartres this state of collapse was still present, but some indulgent tenderness presently enwrapped and warmed the spirit. The soul as it recovered was no longer alone; it was encouraged and perceptibly helped by the Virgin, who revived it. And this impression, peculiar to this crypt, permeated the body too; it was no longer a feeling of suffocation for lack of air; on the contrary, it was the oppression of inflation, of over-fulness, which would be mitigated by degrees, allowing of easy breathing at last. –J.K.Huysmans ‘The Cathedral’

spacer

Come Forth Ye Prisoners

Come forth thee prisoner from the shadows of your captivity,
From the remote recesses of the human heart,
a light has emerged,
From the hollow echoes of dungeons,
a song has broken forth
and in the weeping of frozen winter gasps
the circulation of a beating heart
has poured a river of blood
on the desolate landscape,

The crimson victory of martyrs
has given new life to the desert,

A procession of the saints of old erupts in the weeping city

The tambourine interrupts the stale speech of the megaphone,
The haughty promises and empty lies
advertised generation after generation
have been stripped of their false messiah,

and daughter Zion rejoices for her hour
has arrived,

With the sweet smell of incense
the mingling of heaven and earth,
has made all things new
in the dazzling light of the transfigured moment,

Oh thee captives of Babylon,
leave the ruined fortress of your fear,
For the walls have been shattered,
Leave the tired excuses of borrowed ideologies;
a living truth has taken flesh
and proclaimed an end to your slavery,

Come forth thee prisoner
from the shadows of your wounded heart,
Break out into singing!
Rejoice for your victory has arrived.

for the Monastic Family of Bethlehem
Livingston Manor, NY 2016

A poem by Father Ian Vanhuesen

spacer

Timelessness, Endlessness and the Applicability of Mass

And as he spoke the despairing words, “My God, my God, wherefore is my spirit heavy, and why dost Thou afflict me?” the priest was indeed the image of Jesus suffering on the hill of Calvary; but the man remained in the celebrant—the man, conscious of himself, and himself experiencing, in behoof of his personal sins and his own shortcomings…

Meanwhile his little acolyte had words of comfort, bid him hope; and after repeating the Confiteor in the face of the congregation, who on their part purified their souls by the same ablution of confession, the priest with revived assurance went up the altar steps and began the Mass.

Positively, in this atmosphere of prayers crushed in by the heavy roof, Durtal, in the midst of kneeling Sisters and women, was struck with a sense as of some early Christian rite buried in the catacombs. Here were the same ecstatic tenderness, the same faith; and it was possible even to imagine some apprehension of surprise, and some eagerness to profess the faith in the face of danger. And thus, as in a vague image, this sacred cellar held the dim picture of the neophytes assembled so long since in the underground caverns of Rome.

The service proceeded before Durtal’s eyes, and he was amazed to watch the boy, who, with half closed eyes and the reserve of timid emotion, kissed the flagons of wine and of water before presenting them to the priest.

Durtal would look no more; he tried to concentrate his mind while the priest was wiping his hands, for the only prayers he could honestly offer up to God were verses and texts repeated in an undertone.

This only had he in his favor, but this he had: that he passionately loved mysticism and the liturgy, plain-song and cathedrals. Without falsehood or self-delusion, he could in all truth exclaim, “Lord, I have loved the habitation of Thy house, and the place where Thine honor dwelleth.” This was all he had to offer to the Father in expiation of his contumely and refractoriness, his errors and his falls.

“Oh!” thought he, “how could I dare to pour out the ready-made collects of which the prayer-books are full, how say to God, while addressing Him as ‘Lovely Jesus,’ that He is the beloved of my heart, that I solemnly vow never to love anything but Him, that I would die rather than ever displease Him?

“Love none but Him!—lf I were a monk and alone, possibly; but living in the world!—And then who but the Saints would prefer death to the smallest sin? Why then humbug Him these feints and grimaces?

“No,” said Durtal, “apart from the personal outpourings, the secret intimacy in which we are bold to tell Him everything that comes into our head, the prayers of the liturgy alone can be uttered with impunity by any man, for it is the peculiarity of these inspirations that they adapt themselves in all ages to every state of the mind and every phase of life…. –J.K. Huysmans ‘The Cathedral’

spacer

Higher Power in the face of weakness

O poor little butterfly! chained by so many fetters that stop thee from flying where thou wouldst! Have pity on her, O my God, and so dispose her ways that she may be able to accomplish some of her desires for Thy honor and glory! Take no account of the poverty of her merits, nor of the vileness of her nature, Lord, Thou Who hast the power to compel the vast ocean to retire, and didst force the wide river Jordan to draw back so that the Children of Israel might pass through! Yet spare her not, for aided by Thy strength she can endure many trials. She is resolved to do so—she desires to suffer them. Stretch forth Thine arm, O Lord, to help her lest she waste her life on trifles! Let Thy greatness appear in this Thy creature, womanish and weak as she is, so that men, seeing the good in her is not her own, may praise Thee for it! Let it cost her what it may and as dear as she desires, for she longs to lose a thousand lives to lead one soul to praise Thee but a little better. If as many lives were hers to give, she would count them well spent in such a cause, knowing as a truth most certain that she is unworthy to bear the lightest cross, much less to die for Thee.

I cannot tell why I have said this, sisters, nor what made me do so; indeed I never intended it. You must know that these effects are bound to follow from such trances or ecstasies: they are not transient, but permanent desires; when opportunity occurs of acting on them, they prove genuine. How can I say that they are permanent, when at times the soul feels cowardly in the most trivial matters and too timorous to undertake any work for God?

I believe it is because our Lord, for its greater good, then leaves the soul to its natural weakness, which at once convinces it so thoroughly that any strength it possessed came from His Majesty as to destroy its self-love, enduing it with a greater knowledge of the mercy and greatness of God which He deigned to show forth in one so vile….. St Teresa of Avila ‘Interior Castles’

 

spacer
spacer

In Fullness

‘Interiority’ implies self-acceptance. The desired interiority means that fully functioning, self-actualizing, fully human people not only are aware of physical, psychological, and spiritual hungers and activities, but also accept them as good. Such people are “at home” with their bodies, their tender as well as hostile emotions, their impulses, thoughts, and desires.

Not only are fully human people “at home” with what they have already experienced within themselves, but they are open to new sensations, new and deeper emotional reactions, changing thoughts and desires. They accept their inner condition as forever changing, since growth always involves change. Their ultimate destiny as human beings, that is, what they will become at the end of their lives, is delightfully unknown….Their potential selves, newly actualized every day by new experiences, cannot possibly be defined at any one stage of their growth.

Full human people accept what they are, physically, emotionally, and intellectually. They know that they are, as far as it is known to them, good. They know that their potential selves are even greater. They are, however realistic about their limitations; they do not dwell in dreams of what they want to be and spend the rest of their lives convincing themselves that they are these things. They have listened to, explored and loved what they actually are. And each new day this experience of themselves will be as new as the day itself because they are forever changing, self-renovating personality. They trust their own abilities and resources, confident that they can adapt to and cope with all the challenges that their lives will present.

This kind of self-acceptance empowers people to live fully and confidentially with all that goes on inside them. They are afraid of nothing that is or a part of themselves.

Exteriority implies an openness not only to the self within but to the environment without. Fully human people are in deep and meaningful contact with the world outside themselves, to the voices of their world. The breadth of their own individual experience is infinitely multiplied through a sensitive empathy with others. They suffer with the suffering, rejoice with the joyful. They are born again in every springtime, feel the impact of the great mysteries of life: birth, growth, love, suffering, death. Their hearts skip along with the “young lovers” and they know something of the exhilaration that is in them. They also know the ghetto’s philosophy of despair, the loneliness of suffering without relief. The bell never tolls without tolling in some strange way for them.

“Create in me, O God, a listening heart,” the psalmist prays.

The opposite of this openness is a type of “defensiveness.” This defensiveness hears only what it wants to hear, according to its own preconceived structure and bias. It sees only what it wants to see. Defensive people cannot be growing persons because their world is no bigger than themselves, and the circle of their horizons is tightly closed.

‘Exteriority’ reaches its peak in the ability to ‘give love freely,’…an absolute need to be loved (infancy) toward a full readiness to give love (maturity), with all sorts of stages in between…the unions of love, points out two pitfalls that can stifle human growth: a complacent satisfaction that settles for that which already is, and, at the other extreme, a restless activity that goes from distraction to distraction in search of something beyond. The result…is always self-estrangement. In love we must possess and savor that which is, and simultaneously reach out to possess (to love) the good more fully. This is the balance achieved by full human beings. It is the balance between “what is” and “what is to come”.

Fully human beings, in their love, do not identify themselves with what they love, so these loved things are not extensions of themselves. Gabriel Marcel, in his book ‘Being and Having’ laments that our civilization teaches us how to take possessions of things, when it should rather initiate us in the art of letting go. There is neither freedom nor real life without an apprenticeship in dispossession. Father John Powell ‘Why Am I Afraid to Tell You Who I Am?’.

Reading the words, instructed to read the words through relations with a group of amiable men seeking self-improvement, I embrace the reading effort, yet there is a leeriness. The malleability defined by Father Powell is welcomed. The acceptance and comprehending of limitations, understanding who I am within the rejecting of delusion and negativity, wonders if the term ‘fully human being’ is necessary. The establishing of this breathing and walking marvel of human magnificence appears idealistic, attached to potentialities of grandeur rather than honesty and humility. Cautious of defensiveness, I recognize it is not who I am. Father Powell’s words: “They are afraid of nothing that is or a part of themselves” are distant to me. I cannot embrace them. I am aware they can be explained, yet I do not feel safe with the idea. I am afraid of many of my thoughts. I am afraid where my thoughts have taken me in the past, realizing the possibility of self-destruction. With respect and love, I am fearful of myself. Avoiding negativity, seeking truth, I contemplate the scandals in Father Powell’s life. The lack of sexual boundaries with women he was tendering care to seemingly points to a mindset emboldened with a sense of false truth, a confidence bolstered by the idea of infallibility. Based solely upon intention, a feel-good pursuit of comforting interaction, I would suspect his indiscretions were not so much a selfish quest for pleasure, although in honesty that must be recognized as a part of it, the underlying motivation, I am confident, was a misguided effort to bring a deeper meaning into another’s life. With growth in mind, I think a fear of ourselves is healthy when revealing the love of God within our lives. We don’t need to look longingly toward the idea of “fully human beings’ as inspiration and potentialities, rather a surrender to mystery, a loving appreciation of the Divine, the perfection of God, and the stimulus of a dogmatically proclaimed human perfection in Our Loving Mother. In prayer, we can contemplatively move outward with meekness to Mary’s husband Joseph, beholden to the saints. Anyway, thoughts for now. In order to be a ‘fully human being’, maybe we need to lose the idea of being fully human.

spacer

Interior Chambers

And facing these chambers of the soul, dim with mist, he was struck by a strange association of the Revelations of Saint Theresa and a tale by Edgar Poe.

Those chambers of the inner man were empty and cold, and like the halls of the House of Usher, surrounded by a moat whence the fog rose, forcing its way in at last and cracking the worn shell of wall. Alone and uneasy, he prowled about the ruined cells, with closed doors that refused ever to open again; thus his walks about his own mind were very limited, and the panorama he could see was strangely narrowed, shrunk close and near to him, almost nothing. And he knew full well that the ruins surrounding the central cell, the Master’s Room, were bolted and fastened with rivets that could not be unscrewed, and triple bars—inaccessible. So he restricted himself to wandering in the halls and passages.

At Notre Dame de l’Atre he had ventured further; he had gone into the enclosure round about the abode of Christ; he had seen in the distance the frontiers of Mysticism, and, too weak to go on his road, he had fallen; and now this was to be lamented, for, as Saint Theresa truly remarks, “in the spiritual life, if we do not go forward, we go back.” He had, in fact, retraced his steps, and lay half paralyzed, no longer even in the vestibule of his mansion, but in the outer court.

Till this time the phenomena described by the matchless Abbess (St Teresa of Avila] had been exactly repeated. In Durtal, the Chambers of the Soul were deserted as after a long mourning; but in the rooms that had remained open, phantoms of sins confessed, of buried evil-doing, wandered like the sister of the tormented Usher.

Durtal, like Edgar Poe’s unhappy sufferer, listened with horror to the rustle of steps on the stairs, the piteous weeping behind the doors.

And yet these ghosts of departed crimes were no more than indefinite shapes; they never consolidated nor took a definite form. The most persistent miscreant of them all, which had tormented him so long, the sin of the flesh, at last was silenced, and left him in peace. La Trappe had rooted up the stock of those debaucheries. The memory of them, indeed, haunted him still, on his most distressing, most ignoble side; but he could see them pass, his heart in his mouth, wondering that he could so long have been the dupe of such foul delusions, no longer understanding the power of those mirages, the illusions of those carnal oasis as he met them in the desert of a life shut up in seclusion, in solitude, and in books.

His imagination could still put him on the rack; still, without merit, without a struggle, by the help of divine grace, he had escaped a fall ever since his return from the monastery. –J.K. Huysmans ‘The Cathedral’ 

spacer